Category: Finances & Budgets

  • Status of the “Jalisco Condo Manual – Second Edition”

    The “Jalisco Condo Manual – Second Edition” was originally scheduled to be published in July, 2015. Unfortunately, there has been a significant delay in this new edition because we need to include details from two ongoing and important issues:

    1. We are currently walking a condo through the entire process of SAT registration, bank account set-up, contracting of an accountant, and regular financial reporting – to be sure they fully comply with the new tax laws. Once this is done, we’ll have a detailed real-world guide on how to do this for the new edition of the book. Not surprisingly, this is taking longer than expected.

    2. A high court in Jalisco has ruled that Article 1032 (that allows a condo to sell the property of a delinquent owner at public auction) is unconstitutional as written. Because this is such a key article, as well as a vital weapon in a condo’s arsenal against delinquencies, this has significant impact on how to sue a delinquent owner. We are walking a test case through the Jalisco courts with a modified method of suing that we believe circumvents the legal problem. Once we figure out how this can be done successfully, with the end result being the removal of the delinquent owner from the condo, we’ll include complete details and procedures in the new edition. The case is progressing well, but such things always take longer than you might expect.

    Since these are both vital issues affecting condos, we have decided to wait until we have all the information before completing the new edition. This will make the new book much better and more relevant! Unfortunately, at the time of writing this post, we are still a few months away. We believe that the finished product, however, will be worth the delay.

    We hope you understand, and thank you for your patience.

  • Is a Condo Responsible For Property Tax Bills?

    An issue has come up recently that’s produced a flurry of questions from my readers. This topic seems to have created more interest than any other. So… a blog post seems in order.

    Disclaimer

    I have no first-hand knowledge of this situation. Everything I know about what the municipalities are allegedly doing is second and third-hand.

    As always, these are my personal opinions and not legal advice. If your condo is directly affected, you need to get a Mexican legal professional involved.

    Municipal back taxes

    It appears that some municipalities in Jalisco are trying to ferret out property owners who have not paid their property taxes. Presumably, this is to create more revenue for the city coffers.

    Apparently, they’re trying to identify unregistered construction and lots. Unfortunately, it appears that condominium common property has also come under their radar.

    They appear to have hired property assessors to take measurements and photos of property they suspect, and to arrive at a tax value. From this, they seem to be assessing back taxes and penalties. They might be going back as far as ten years.

    At least one condominium that I have heard about has been presented with a large bill.

    Issue #1: a condominium is not a property owner

    In my opinion, the municipality should not invoice a condominium for property taxes – current taxes or back taxes. This is because a condo does not own any property, including the common property.

    The common property is co-owned by all owners. Each owner’s title to their private unit also includes a percentage ownership of all common property. This is clearly set out in each owner’s title document. Article 1001 of the Jalisco Civil Code defines this proportional ownership of common areas and property, and says that such ownership cannot be separated from the individual property.

    From this I believe that if any property taxes are owed, then they’re owed by the owners of the property, and not by the condo. It appears that they might be going after the wrong party to collect these. In my opinion, the tax department is taking this approach because it’s easier to try to collect from a single source than from multiple property owners.

    Issue #2: are back taxes owed?

    The municipal tax department must assess property taxes on any property that’s correctly registered with a public title. All private units in a condo presumably fit this bill. The registered titles for each condo unit specifically include a percentage ownership of the common property.

    When a valuation is placed on a condo unit for tax purposes, one would expect that it would take into account the co-owned portion of the common property that’s clearly defined in the Civil Code and in the title document of the unit.

    If a tax department is now claiming that they failed to do this, then I’d expect that they must prove that their valuation did not include the common property.

    If they can prove that their tax valuations did not include the percentage ownership of the common property, then they can likely recover the lost taxes. However, I fail to see how they can attach penalties to an error that they made.

    My condo has always paid the property tax

    A few condos have an arrangement in their by-laws by which they pay property taxes.

    This might or might not mean that the condo has a tax obligation to the municipality.

    I think it would depend entirely on the wording of the by-laws. Remember not to get bogged down in the semantics of any English translation of your by-laws. This is easy to do. All that matters is what it says in the Spanish version that has been publicly registered.

    Hopefully, such a by-law clause would only appoint the condo administration as an agent to pay owners’ property taxes from the budget and fees as a convenience to the owners. In my opinion, this is a dangerous thing for a condo to do. However, if that’s what your by-laws say, then you likely have this obligation.

    If this applies to your condo, then you need to have a Mexican legal professional examine the wording of your by-laws to determine how liable your condo might be.

    What should we do?

    If your condo has not been presented with a bill for back taxes, then I don’t believe there’s anything for the administration to do other than take part in public discussions, and keep informed on the issue.

    If your condo has been presented with a tax bill, then I think your administration first needs to talk to a Mexican legal professional. I believe that ultimately the goal of the condo should be to shift this tax burden to the individual property owners where it belongs.

    I wouldn’t suggest that the Administrator or the Board pay any such tax bill without the specific agreement of the owners meeting in an extraordinary assembly convened for that purpose.

    If the individual owners receive tax bills, then they can try to dispute this on the basis that the taxes they have been paying included or should have included the common property. They should certainly dispute any penalties. Again, they should get legal help for their particular case.

    If your condo has a by-law section that seems to make the condo responsible for paying property taxes, again I wouldn’t recommend that the administration pay this without legal advice and the specific agreement of the owners.

    If it seems you must pay, hold an extraordinary assembly

    The owners are the title holders of the property in question, and it’s their money the condo would use to pay any such tax bill.

    If the legal professional you meet with believes that money is owed by the condo, then I strongly recommend that you call an extraordinary assembly to ask for the owners’ permission to pay (remember you need 20 days notice).

    The wording of the resolution needs to be carefully considered. I can see two possible approaches:

    The resolution might be to authorise the administration to pay this specific tax bill for the owners, and how it will be funded (such as by a special assessment). If this resolution passes, then the administration should be protected from owners who object to the condo paying this bill.

    Or the resolution could do the opposite, and forbid the administration from paying this specific tax bill, making each owner directly responsible for paying their portion. In a condo with a by-law provision to pay property taxes on the owners’ behalf, this might modify the by-law section with a specific exception.

    Both the choice of approach and the wording needs a legal opinion.

    If the result of the assembly is that the administration should not pay, then I think the condo should have their legal representative present a copy of the registered minutes of the extraordinary assembly to the tax department. After this, they should hopefully turn their collection efforts to the individual owners.

    Community Input

    If you have direct experience with this issue that you feel would add to this post, or if you’ve been advised by a Mexican legal professional, please share your knowledge with the community by posting a comment.

  • Dealing With Employees & Independent Contractors

    A condo often needs to hire people such as an Administrator, accountant, people to look after the common property (like gardeners or a pool maintenance contractor), and even security guards.

    There are two different ways a condo can hire someone to do work, and it’s important to clearly understand the differences:

    1. employee; or
    2. independent contractor

    Let’s deal with each separately.

    Employees

    All employee/employer relationships are governed by the Mexican constitution (Article 123) and the Ley Federal de Trabajo (Federal Labour Law). The labour law was last updated on November 30, 2012. Mexican labour laws are much more stringent than north of the border, and are strictly enforced. All Articles quoted in this post are from this law.

    Employees can be hired for either an indeterminate or a fixed period of time. Different benefits apply to these two groups.

    Most employees fall into the first category: when hired, it’s not known if they’ll be doing the job for a month or 15 years. Employment ends when the employee quits or is terminated. Or else, it continues indefinitely.

    Under special circumstances outlined in the law (Article 37), your condo can hire an employee for a fixed time period (6 months, for example), or for a specific project (sort and file boxes of documents into a filing cabinet). In both of these cases, if the employee doesn’t quit or is terminated, employment automatically stops at the end of the set time period or the end of the project.

    Cost of terminating an employee

    When employment is terminated, the employee is entitled to any wages owed up to the date of termination, vacation pay (Article 76) plus a vacation bonus (Article 80), a pro-rated portion of their aguinaldo (Christmas bonus – Article 87), and a seniority bonus (Article 162).

    Most employees are also entitled to severance costs. The exceptions are covered in Article 53: employment ended by mutual consent (get this in writing!), the employee died, an employment for a set time period or specific project has ended as agreed, or the employee has been terminated for cause (Article 46).

    The reasons for termination for cause are limited (Article 47), are serious wrongdoings (such as dishonesty, drug or alcohol abuse, insubordination, and unjustified absenteeism), do not include poor work, and require concrete proof on the part of the employer. In general, this is very hard to do.

    The condo must notify any employee in writing of offences listed under Article 47, and have the employee sign the copy kept in the condo files. If the condo wants to terminate this employee for cause, you must have these documents.

    The condo must give the employee advance notice of termination in writing, or the termination will be automatically considered as unjustified. If the condo fails to prove that it had a right to terminate the employee for cause, it’ll have to pay severance costs, and can be liable for wages from the date of the termination until the final payment is made to the ex-employee.

    A termination “without cause” (most terminations) for an employee working for an indeterminate time always results in severance costs. These typically consist of (Article 50): 20 days salary for each year worked, plus three months salary, plus wages from the date of termination until the date the employee has been paid severance and other costs.

    If an employee hired for a specific time period or project is terminated without cause before the agreed end of the time or project, then they’re owed severance of 50% of the wages already paid to them, plus 20 days salary for each year worked over one year.

    The finiquito

    If a condo terminates an employee, it must have them sign a dated and witnessed document (the finiquito) containing a brief statement of their employment and salary, and detailing the amounts and calculations of the various wages, benefits, and severance amounts being paid.

    It must also say that the employee agrees, and that this is the total compensation. However, it’s important to note that any waiver by the employee to wages earned, or to benefits or severance to which they are legally entitled is null and void (Article 33).

    Ideally, have this document prepared beforehand, then have it signed and pay out the worker on the day of termination. Any delay in finalising the employee’s compensation payment past the date of termination results in more costs to the condo. The condo will owe wages for each day between the date of termination and the payment of compensation to the employee (Article 50 III).

    Ongoing costs of employees

    While an employee is working for a condo, certain items must be deducted at source from the employee’s wages and remitted to the government:

    • income tax
    • IMSS (social security)
    • INFONAVIT
    • SAR pension fund

    The condo must keep accurate records of these deductions and their filing with the government. If a condo fails to make these deductions and remit them, a disgruntled employee can cause serious problems by reporting this omission to the government.

    It’s also a good idea to get a signed receipt for all wages paid to an employee. The more employment records the condo has for the employee, the better.

    Your condo must also give all employees a paid vacation, and pay an annual Christmas bonus (aguinaldo). Be aware of overtime regulations and statutory holidays. The condo is also required to have adequate work space for the employee to carry out their work, the tools needed to do the job, and deliver all training needed to do the job.

    Employment contract

    Workers hired for a specific time period or project must have a contract, or there’s no way of proving when the employment ended, and the employee will become a regular employee entitled to severance.

    All other employees should also have an employment contract to protect the condo. Without a formal contract (Articles 20, 21, & 26), Mexican labour laws favour the employee over the employer, and the burden of proof about the details of the employment relationship is always on the employer.

    For example, if your condo terminates an employee and pays him three years severance, but he then claims he worked for the condo for five years, the condo must be able to prove a three year employment with documentary evidence.

    The dated employment contract must include (Article 25):

    • personal details of the employee and the employer;
    • type of employment (indefinite time or specific time or project, or seasonal work), and any initial training or trial periods;
    • the work to be done by the employee, described as precisely as possible;
    • the place(s) where the work must be carried out;
    • the length of the workday (be aware of overtime rules);
    • the form and amount of wages (must be paid weekly);
    • the day and place for payment of wages;
    • a statement that the employee will be trained as needed; and
    • any other employment terms such as days off, vacations, or other items agreed to by the worker and the employer.

    The agreements in an employment contracts are binding on both parties, as long as they’re consistent with the labour law, good faith, and equity. Despite what an employment contract says, it’s always governed by the Federal Labour Law. Any terms in an employment contract that contradict the labour law will be considered null and void. In particular, any waiver of an employees rights to overtime, benefits, or severance is invalid.

    Independent contractors

    Independent contractors have many advantages over employees.

    Unlike an employee, there are no deductions at source that have to be remitted, there are no benefits to be paid, and a condo can terminate them without severance.

    Must be contracted

    For a service provider to be considered as an independent contractor, rather than an employee, a properly executed and dated contract for services must exist. This must include:

    • personal details of the employee and the employer;
    • fact that this is a contract for services, that the worker isn’t an employee, and isn’t entitled to benefits or severance;
    • the work to be done, described as precisely as possible;
    • the form and amount of fees for services (usually monthly);
    • the day and place for payment of fees; and
    • any other contract items agreed to by the service provider and the employer.

    Note that if your condo is contracting a condo Administrator, the contract can only be for one year (Civil Code Article 1011).

    Who can be an independent contractor?

    Be careful! Your condo can’t just have all its employees sign service contracts, and get out of paying them overtime, benefits, or severance.

    If a subordinate relationship exists between the service provider and the condo, Mexican law will decide that an employee/employer relationship exists. In this case, all employee benefits and compensation will apply!

    An independent contractor is a service provider hired to carry out a specific task, with the ability to choose their own method of doing the work. They’re under the control and direction of the condo administration only insofar as the end result of their work is concerned, and not as to the way in which the work is carried out.

    An independent contractor can be either a person or a company.

    There are certain criteria that a service provider must meet to be considered an independent contractor, rather than an employee (the existence of a contract for services doesn’t guarantee this):

    1. has “authoritative control” to do their work the way they want, in their professional or expert capacity (not constantly supervised and instructed except as far as the end result is concerned);
    2. is free to set their own schedule and hours (not required to be at the condo three days a week from 9:00 to 5:00, for example)
    3. provides their own office (or work base) and office supplies, provides their own tools, pays their own business expenses, and hires their own assistants or employees;
    4. are paid only for work done (such as by a monthly fixed fee), and has no paid vacations or holidays, and doesn’t receive the annual aguinaldo (Christmas bonus); and
    5. has other paying clients (performs similar services for other people besides the condo), and markets their services to the public.
  • Your Condo’s Fiscal Year

    In my book, the “Jalisco Condo Manual,” I say that a condo’s fiscal year should run from April 1 to March 31.

    I get a lot of questions like, “Where does it say this in the condo law?”

    It’s Implicit Rather Than Explicit

    Those of you who’ve asked this are right! There’s nothing in the Civil Code that directly says this. However, in my opinion, this is an implicit requirement, rather than an explicit one.

    Here’s my logic:

    Article 1012.VII of the Civil Code says that the Administrator must give a financial report in the first fifteen days of April, July, October, and January of each year. These are the quarterly reports. Since the financial reporting is clearly expected to be done in calendar quarters, I believe that the intent is that the fiscal year starts at the beginning of one of these quarters. Therefore, your fiscal year should start on the first of April, July, October, or January.

    So… why not January 1st?

    Article 1020 of the code says that the annual assembly is required to be held in the first three months of the calendar year, and the purpose of this assembly (among others) is to approve the budget for the next fiscal year.

    Assume you want your fiscal year to start on January 1, and you hold your assembly in Mid-March.

    Your last approved budget would have expired on December 31. Since your condo can’t operate without an approved budget, I can’t see how you could legally function in January, February, and March until the assembly. If you do this, you would have been operating with no approved budget for two-and-a-half months, and you would also be approving your budget and fees for this time-period after-the-fact.

    What if the after-the-fact budget didn’t pass, or had to be changed for any reason?

    How do you legally set fees for this first quarter without the approval of an assembly? How can you collect from owners who don’t pay them?

    This logic applies no matter in which of these three months you hold your assembly (January, February, or March), since any of these would be after the start of your fiscal year.

    OK… so why not July 1st or October 1st?

    I don’t believe that starting your fiscal year in July or October will have any legal issues, but there are practical considerations.

    Preparing a new budget as close to the end of a fiscal year will always give you more accurate results than preparing one only part way through.

    For example, suppose your fiscal year started on October 1st, and you were voting on your budget for the next year at an annual assembly in February. You would only have about four months of actual expense data on which to base your next budget.

    For these reasons, I believe that the fiscal year should start on April 1. That said, the best person to ask for advice on this is an accountant.

    What about taxes?

    I’ve heard conflicting reports that Hacienda insists on a tax year that’s the same as the calendar year (or not).

    If this is the case, then it might be possible to have a tax year (for tax accounting purposes) that differs from your fiscal year (for budget and fee purposes). This is common in the US and Canada, but I’m not sure if or how this works in México.

    If you know for sure, please help…

    If you do have a definitive and substantiated answer on the fiscal year or the tax year, please share it with the rest of us!